Abstract

*Tillyashayhov M. N., Rakhimov O. A., Adilkhodjaev A. A., Akhmedov O. M. and Mahkamov T. Kh.

ABSTRACT

The aim is to compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for colorectal cancer by analyzing the long-term treatment results. In this study, the authors presented an evaluation of the comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer. 92 patients with histologically verified colorectal cancer were included in this study. By randomization, patients were divided into the control group (open surgery, n = 46 cases) and the main group (laparoscopic surgery, n = 46 cases). The duration of surgery (122.54 ± 14.85) min and incision length (4.51 ± 1.065) cm were shorter in the main group compared to the control group. Intraoperative blood loss in the main group was (161.12 ± 10.694) ml, versus the control group (218.53 ± 15.369) ml (p<0.05). Patients in the main group had a higher five-year survival rate and a lower incidence of postoperative complications, compared to the control group (for all P<0.05). Thus, the use of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer has a better clinical effect than open surgery and is worthy of clinical application.